The real reasons Nissan pulled its investment

Nissan's change of heart over making the X-Trail in Sunderland set Brexit alarm bells ringing over the weekend.

It was further evidence, to some, that car investment in the UK is drying up as we head towards the EU exit - ripping up promises made by Margaret Thatcher to Japanese manufacturers that they should consider the UK as their natural manufacturing outpost within the EU.

While it is wrong to think that Brexit was the main reason Nissan pulled the X-Trail from Sunderland, it is still right to think that Brexit is proving a powerful deterrent for investment in the UK car industry.

Some of the technical issues it throws up could start affecting UK car exports as soon as next week.

But there are three other important factors affecting the UK car industry.

Nissan is not the only company to have been caught off guard by the sudden and rapid slump in diesel sales across Europe.

The VW emissions scandal and the subsequent confusion about diesel among regulators and consumers, have dealt a heavy blow to sales and production with JLR being the most conspicuous casualty.

Under current market conditions it simply made no sense for Nissan to invest in a new diesel manufacturing facility in northern Europe.

The fact that the UK is about to leave the world's biggest trading bloc creating border uncertainty is an aggravating factor for sure but not Nissan's primary reason.

There are other powerful forces at work.

As of last week, the free trade agreement between the EU and Japan came into force.

Under that deal, tariffs on Japanese car exports to the EU begin to taper towards zero over the next ten years.

That means there is a dwindling rationale for Japan to manufacture cars for European customers in the EU.

In fact, post Brexit, cars from Japan entering the EU could attract lower tariffs than cars made in the UK.

There is another Brexit problem.

One of the highest growth areas for UK exports has been South Korea after trade has been stimulated by a trade agreement with the EU.

Currently the UK enjoys the preferential terms thanks to its membership of the EU. After March 29th it won't.

Given it takes six weeks to transport cars to South East Asia, from mid-February (end of next week) manufacturers face the prospect of loading ships with exports to markets without knowing what tariffs will apply to those products when they come off at the other end.

International Trade secretary Dr Liam Fox has been confident that we can replicate this and simply tippex out "EU" on the front page of nearly 40 free trade agreements and replace it with "UK".

It's not that simple.

For products to enjoy preferential terms under a trade deal, there is a requirement for them to be predominantly made of components from that country.

In the trade deal the EU has with South Korea, 55% of the car components must be from the EU.

If the same test was applied to the UK as a stand-alone country, none of the cars manufactured here would pass a test requiring 55% of components to come from the UK.

It is possible that the terms of a future UK-EU trade deal would include asking South Korea, Morocco, Mexico and others if they would allow UK and EU parts to be added together to pass the test but it's far from clear they would agree.

So far Liam Fox has only managed to ensure a trade continuity deal with Chile.

In an uncertain world, we can say one thing with certainty. Investment in the UK car industry has collapsed.

In 2015, companies invested £2.5bn, last year it was less than £600m - a fall of nearly 80% in just three years.

Brexit may not have done for the X-Trail, but it is having a corrosive effect on the wider car industry.