Council will bring social housing in-house

Social housing in Northampton will be brought back in-house after a number of "failings" were identified in the last couple of years.

West Northamptonshire Council's 11,500 homes were managed by Northamptonshire Partnership Homes (NPH).

Charlie Hastie, cabinet member for housing, told a meeting on Tuesday: "Transparency, accountability and legal and safe is the overriding driving force of what we've got to do, and it has not been forthcoming [by NPH] in the last year or so."

The cabinet voted in favour of bringing it in-house, and it was the first major decision by the Reform UK-led council after the party took control of the authority in the local elections in May.

The council will undertake a full consultation in July to hear directly from tenants and leaseholders.

NPH is an arms-length management organisation (ALMO), first established by the now defunct Northampton Borough Council in 2015.

It is responsible for repairs and maintenance, housing development and management, including dealing with anti-social behaviour, tenancy support and the Ecton Lane Park traveller site.

The council's housing stock included key estates in Kings Heath, Kingsthorpe, and Spring Boroughs in the town. It included high-rise blocks, a range of 1 to 6-bed properties and supported accommodation, 15 community hubs, older persons' accommodation and more than 2,000 garages.

Last year, the then Conservative-controlled West Northamptonshire Council announced it was taking "immediate steps" to address the "performance failings" of NPH.

It also confirmed it had referred itself to the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH).

The review by the RSH found some council-managed homes failed to meet national safety and quality standards.

Among the concerns in the report was inaccurate data reporting, including overdue fire risk assessments for 180 properties.

However, the local authority confirmed that all outstanding fire safety checks were completed by December 2024

The cabinet discussed three options for the future management of homes in the town.

Labour group leader Sally Keeble told the cabinet meeting: "There's only one realistic option on the table about bringing it back in-house; however, I don't think that is remotely adequate to deal with the scale and the size of the problems.

"When you look at this option, there really does need to be a full options appraisal [of all the housing stock in West Northamptonshire]."

The Conservative group leader, Dan Lister, said: "These aren't the only three options that have been presented before us, and there are significantly more options that we should be considering."

Leader of the Liberal Democrat group, Jonathan Harris, said: "ALMO's an interesting term - arms-length - it feels to me like it's been a very very long arm."

Hastie said bringing it in-house was to ensure residents received "the best possible housing service".

He added: "One that is safe, responsive, and accountable. By bringing this provision back in-house, we can simplify governance, strengthen compliance, and have greater control over quality while also providing tenants with the best value for money."

Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.